Model editing enables targeted updates to the knowledge of large language models (LLMs) with minimal retraining. Among existing approaches, locate-then-edit methods constitute a prominent paradigm: they first identify critical layers, then compute residuals at the final critical layer based on the target edit, and finally apply least-squares-based multi-layer updates via residual distribution. While empirically effective, we identify a counterintuitive failure mode: residual distribution, a core mechanism in these methods, introduces weight shift errors that undermine editing precision. Through theoretical and empirical analysis, we show that such errors increase with the distribution distance, batch size, and edit sequence length, ultimately leading to inaccurate or suboptimal edits. To address this, we propose the Boundary Layer UpdatE (BLUE) strategy to enhance locate-then-edit methods. Sequential batch editing experiments on three LLMs and two datasets demonstrate that BLUE not only delivers an average performance improvement of 35.59%, significantly advancing the state of the art in model editing, but also enhances the preservation of LLMs' general capabilities. Our code is available at https://github.com/xpq-tech/BLUE.

Model editing offers a promising paradigm for efficiently and precisely updating knowledge in pre-trained transformers without costly retraining. While extensively studied in language models (LMs), model editing for vision transformers (ViTs) remains underexplored. Existing methods typically adapt LM-based techniques by modifying the multi-layer perceptron (MLP) modules, overlooking the unique characteristics of ViTs. In this work, we show that ViT predictions are more strongly influenced by the multi-head self-attention (MSA) modules than by the MLPs. Building on this observation, we propose a twostage framework for editing ViTs. First, we identify which attention heads are most responsible for incorrect predictions. Next, we selectively remove the corresponding features to correct the model's prediction. To further balance error correction with predictive stability on unrelated data, we learn a projection matrix that refines the image representations. Extensive experiments across multiple real-world datasets and model editing benchmarks demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms existing model editing methods for ViTs, achieving superior generalization and locality.

Model editing has become a de-facto practice to address hallucinations and outdated knowledge of large language models (LLMs). However, existing methods are predominantly evaluated in isolation, i.e., one edit at a time, failing to consider a critical scenario of compositional model editing, where multiple edits must be integrated and jointly utilized to answer real-world multifaceted questions. For instance, in medical domains, if one edit informs LLMs that COVID-19 causes "fever" and another that it causes "loss of taste", a qualified compositional editor should enable LLMs to answer the question "What are the symptoms of COVID-19?" with both "fever" and "loss of taste" (and potentially more). In this work, we define and systematically benchmark this compositional model editing (CME) task, identifying three key undesirable issues that existing methods struggle with: knowledge loss, incorrect preceding and knowledge sinking. To overcome these issues, we propose A3E, a novel compositional editor that (1) adaptively combines and adaptively regularizes pre-trained foundation knowledge in LLMs in the stage of edit training and (2) adaptively merges multiple edits to better meet compositional needs in the stage of edit composing. Extensive experiments demonstrate that A3E improves the composability by at least 22.45% without sacrificing the performance of non-compositional model editing.

Large language models (LLMs) are now pivotal in real-world applications. Model editing has emerged as a promising paradigm for efficiently modifying LLMs without full retraining. However, current editing approaches face significant limitations due to parameter drift, which stems from inconsistencies between newly edited knowledge and the model's existing knowledge. In sequential editing scenarios, cumulative drifts progressively lead to model collapse characterized by general capability degradation and balance between acquiring new knowledge and catastrophic forgetting of existing knowledge. Drawing inspiration from the hippocampal trisynaptic circuit for continual memorizing and forgetting, we propose a Hippocampal-like Sequential Editing (HSE) framework that designs the unlearning of obsolete knowledge, domain-specific knowledge update separation and replay for edited knowledge. Specifically, the HSE framework designs three core mechanisms: (1) Machine unlearning selectively erases outdated knowledge to facilitate integration of new information, (2) Fisher information matrix-guided parameter updates prevents cross-domain knowledge interference, and (3) Parameter replay consolidates long-term editing memory through lightweight and global replay of editing data in a parametric form. Theoretical analysis demonstrates that HSE achieves smaller generalization error bounds, more stable convergence and higher computational efficiency.

Model editing has become a *de-facto* practice to address hallucinations and outdated knowledge of large language models (LLMs). However, existing methods are predominantly evaluated in isolation, i.e., one edit at a time, failing to consider a critical scenario of compositional model editing, where multiple edits must be integrated and jointly utilized to answer real-world multifaceted questions. For instance, in medical domains, if one edit informs LLMs that COVID-19 causes fever and another that it causes loss of taste, a qualified compositional editor should enable LLMs to answer the question What are the symptoms of COVID-19?

Large language models (LLMs) need knowledge updates to meet the ever-growing world facts and correct the hallucinated responses, facilitating the methods of lifelong model editing. Where the updated knowledge resides in memories is a fundamental question for model editing. In this paper, we find that editing either long-term memory (direct model parameters) or working memory (non-parametric knowledge of neural network activations/representations by retrieval) will result in an impossible triangle---reliability, generalization, and locality can not be realized together in the lifelong editing settings. For long-term memory, directly editing the parameters will cause conflicts with irrelevant pretrained knowledge or previous edits (poor reliability and locality). For working memory, retrieval-based activations can hardly make the model understand the edits and generalize (poor generalization). Therefore, we propose WISE to bridge the gap between memories.

BERT, and GPT models show GRACE's state-of-the-art performance in making